Don't Have a Malware Nightmare Before Christmas

This is not a Santa Clara-particular post. But it is important. There's a new e-mail phishing scam going around. And the thing about this one is that I might have gotten caught except for the fact that I have a Mac -- Windows .exe files won't run on a Mac. So even if it's downloaded, it can't install or run. 

(I'm sensitive about this because last Christmas our debit cards and passwords were stolen by a "skimmer" who sold the numbers to someone in Los Angeles. Someone who liked to shop at Juicy Couture -- a dead giveaway. If it had been Talbot's or Macy's I might not have caught on as fast.)

This latest scheme is very convincing: You get an email purportedly from the USPS or FedEx telling you that your package was undeliverable and instructing you to click on the receipt. 

Around Christmas who isn't expecting a package? 

According to Hoax-slayer.com:

"The message is not from USPS. The claim that a package delivery has failed is untrue. The message is an attempt by online criminals to trick users into downloading and installing an information stealing trojan. The link in the scam email points to a compromised website that will automatically download the malicious payload to the victim's computer. If the victim then proceeds to run the downloaded .exe file, a trojan will be installed. Typically, once installed, these trojans can steal sensitive personal information from the infected computer, make connections with remote servers operated by online criminals and download further malware components." 

Best idea? Don't click on anything 'til, like Santa Claus, you check twice to see if it's naughty or nice. 

The Empire Strikes Back

At the Dec. 13 meeting the SCUSD board of trustees, the comrades of the politburo had to hear from critics. So Ina Bendis and Christine Koltermann are taking action to remedy what they are renaming a "civil rights violation" with a "process to improve access to board meetings."

(It's curious that this agenda memo was prepared on Sunday, but the special board meeting wasn't announced until Monday -- and less then 72 hours mandated by the Brown Act and without a majority of the board voting that it was an emergency. Plus, Koltermann and Bendis apparently wrote it together, which sounds like a serial meeting.)

Bendis and Koltermann also compained about the audience decorum, saying they would like to see "role models for conduct that supports [sic] decorum and affirmatively demonstrates respect for all."

Bendis should know, as has been faithfully reported at the Santa Clara Weekly. When it comes to affirmative demonstrations of respect for all, Bendis is the how-not-to-do-it exemplar.

At a July 30, 2012 meeting she remarked, "I'd be thrilled to know which of the many groups that were solicted widely was the group in which Pat Flot was the only person who decided she wanted to serve!"

At the same meeting she also told acting chair Albert Gonzalez -- the sole Latino on the board -- that "maybe the chair [Gonzalez] would like to go out and get himself a copy of Robert's Rules,"adding that reading it required no more than a tenth grade reading level.

In March 2012 Bendis accused trustee Elise DeYoung of perjury and/or stupidity - take your pick. "She unwittingly allowed herself to be manipulated by city officials," said Bendis. "Ms. DeYoung signed two letters she knew would be conveyed with false information," and further accused the board of "secretly colluding with an adversarial party" -- i.e. the City of Santa Clara.

In 2009 she was reportedly overheard at a public event telling a congressional aid that "A mentally challenged 9th grader could do your job better."

And that's not even talking about employee harassment complaints that were filed against the district because of her and the ensuing censure by her colleagues.

Still, board meetings ought to be conducted in rooms where everyone can fit. But until recently, SCUSD's board meetings rarely drew standing room-only audiences -- something that no doubt worked to Bendis' benefit. Now that she has the spotlight, she may soon be pining for the good old days.

Here's the entire memo:

TO: Dr. Bobbie Plough, Superintendent

FROM: Dr. Christine E. Koltermann, SCUSD Board President

PREPARED BY: Dr. Christine E. Koltermann, SCUSD Board President

                               Dr. Ina K. Bendis, SCUSD Trustee

SUBMITTED: December 16, 2012

MEETING DATE: December 18, 2012 (Special Meeting) 

TITLE: Approval for the SCUSD Board of Education to initiate a process

to improve access to Board Meetings by all members of the public.

ADMINISTRATIVE SUBMISSION

The Board President has received complaints that the December 13, 2012

Regular Meeting of the SCUSD Board of Education was not equally

accessible to members of the public, including members of protected

classes. The following is a non-exhaustive list of the kinds of

complaints received.

[1] Seating in the district Board room was almost exclusively reserved

by staff for other staff members, forcing parents and other community

members to stand in the lobby and the hall.

[2] The volume and clarity of the sound system available in the lobby

and hall was insufficient to enable mew~ers of the public who could not

enter the Board room to hear the proceedings;

[3] The background noise level in the lobby and hall due to private

conversations precluded even members of the public who stood within

what normally would have been hearing distance of the speakers, to hear

the proceedings;

[4] Disabled members of the public who could not stand for long periods

of time due to their disabilities, were unable to remain long enough to

listen to the Board's discussion and exercise their right to address

the Board on matters of interest to them, because they did not have

access to the seating they required due to their disabilities;

[5] Latino members of the public who lack proficiency in English, and

whose "protected class" ethnicity comprises more than 30% of District

residents, could not understand the proceedings or contribute their

input to the Board, regardless of whether they were among the fortunate

few non-employees to achieve seating within the Board room.

[6] The repeated outbreaks of applause, hand waving and spontaneous

oral outbreaks by District employees who'd obtained preferential access

to seating in the boardroom compared to members of the public who'd

been excluded from the boardroom due to "Reserved" signs on seats,

denied the physically-excluded individuals equal access to similarly

communicate their own support for views expressed by others, outside of

the time reserved for public comment and, in addition, may have

violated Govt. Code 54957.9 and SCUSD Policy 7370. In addition to this

specific civil rights concern, the refusal of those engaging in this

conduct to cease it when requested by the Board President also

subverted the purpose of Board Policies designed to encourage parent

and community participation at Board meetings; enable the Board's

access to all points of view without minority view-holders' fear of

intimidation or embarrassment; and provide students with Employee role

models for conduct that supports decorum and affirmatively demonstrates

respect for all.

RECOMMENDATION:

The board will take action to initiate a process through which SCUSD

will ensure equal access to all individuals who wish to attend our

Board meetings, with particular attention to ensuring the civil rights

of all Constitutionally-protected classes, to creating an atmosphere of

decorum conducive to the Board carrying out its business as efficiently

as possible; and to proactively avoid an atmosphere that would tend to

suppress expression of minority views. Unless the Board chooses an

alternative approach, the President will appoint a three-Trustee task

force charged with researching the constitutional issues in play;

inviting/receiving input from parents, community members, employees,

bargaining units, and other stakeholders; and formulating an action

plan to ensure civil rights protection, for presentation to the Board

at a later meeting.

Postcards from Beijing

After a mind-blowing effort to condense a 7-hour school board meeting into less than 1200 words, I came down with a bad case of cliche-itis. Leading to this:

Why the unseemly haste to conduct non-stop SCUSD board meetings between now and Christmas? Superintendent Bobbie Plough is leaving in six months -- not six days. Although, Plough makes the 3rd -- or is it 4th? -- Superintendent to retire since Ina Bendis was elected to the Board of Trustees in 2006. (Correlations are not causes, but they do merit attention).

The reason is, according to talk around town, several members of the SCUSD board jet off for a week in China, all-expenses-paid thanks to the Chinese Hanban Institute. They're slated to return in time to ring in the new year.

We don't know if any other county educators are going along, as the COE hasn't yet returned a call asking for more information.

The invite came from the Chinese Hanban Institute. Here's the County Office of Education agenda item from a few weeks ago:

"Hanban is sponsoring a trip to China on December 21-29, 2012 and has extended an invitation to 20 educational administrators from Santa Clara County. Hanban will be covering the cost of international travel, accommodations and meals while in China. The purpose of the trip is to share educational practices. Administration recommends approval of roundtrip airfare [for board members] from the Bay Area to LAX and VISA cost."

The Hanban Institute is an arm of China's Ministry of Education. Its stated mission is promoting and enabling the teaching of Chinese languages outside China.

Hanban is part of a larger entity, the Confucious Institute, which promotes Chinese culture and Confuscian principles and world-view through international educational activities – a similar analogy would be the way the Jesuit Order promotes Catholic principles and world-view through its international educational activities. (Jesuits were active missionaries in China since Fr. Matteo Ricci landed in Macau in 1582). In fact, Belvedere College, a Jesuit secondary school in Dublin, hosts an expanding Hanban language and culture immersion program.

James Rowen suggests that we should beware of Greeks bringing gifts, labeling the trip a Manchurian Junket.

Sacramento Court Blocks County's $30 Million Santa Clara RDA Money Grab

It looks like the County isn't going to be buttering its bread with Santa Clara's $30 million.

Sacramento County Superior Court judge Lloyd Connelly granted the San Francisco 49ers' motion to block Santa Clara County from distributing disputed Santa Clara Redevelopment Agency money earmarked for stadium construction. On June 22, 2012, the Santa Clara Redevelopment Successor Agency Oversight Board voted 4-3 on an off-agenda motion to nullify the former RDA's contract with the 49ers to provide $30 million towards the Santa Clara stadium construction project.

Further, the Sacramento judge isn't buying Santa Clara County's inventive argument that contracts aren't enforceable if laws change, and is taking very seriously the Oversight Board's possible violation of California open public meeting law, the Brown Act. 

In his written decision, Judge Connelly explained that the restraining order was based on "a strong likelihood of the petitioner prevailing in this case, particularly on their Brown Act violation and contract termination claims." A hearing is set for July 27, 2012 at 1:30 p.m. and the judge said that he may rule on the merits of the case at that time.

The case, number 34-2012-80001192, can be found at can be found at www.saccourt.ca.gov. 

Santa Clara Recognized for Good Governance Leadership

Once upon a time a city clerk's role was reactive: keeping the town records. Today, it's proactive, as city clerks are increasingly asked to drive good government programs and expand public engagement with local governance. It's not an understatement to say that city clerks are town CDOs – Chief Democracy Officers.

Last month the International Institute of Municipal Clerks (IIMC) recognized Santa Clara's leadership through the California Ethics and Democracy Project (CEDP, caethicsproject.com) – which had its start in city in 2007 – and City Clerk Rod Diridon's office with the 2012 Program Excellence in Governance Award.

The award was given at the IIMC's second ethics summit, held in Santa Clara, and is the Institute's highest program honor. Among Santa Clara's achievements are its founding role in the CEDP and the organization's first summit in 2009ß. 

The California Ethics and Democracy Project (CEDP) was created to share expertise, formulate best practices, and create an educational curriculum to teach the skills necessary to implement good government efforts, according to Santa Clara City Clerk and CEDP chair Rod Diridon, Jr. 

The CEDP's accomplishments include The Municipal Clerk Decision Roadmap and 6-Way Test for insuring that programs such as voter registration drives or get-out-the-vote campaigns are executed fairly and without bias. "Santa Clara has some of the best programs in the state, they’re a solid model,” says Diridon. “This collaboration helps us to be even more effective by learning what other communities find successful.”


A version of this story was previously published in the Santa Clara Weekly.

Great Sports Writing Still Alive at Santa Clara WEEKLY

One of my favorite Santa Clara WEEKLY features is Melissa McKenzie's Quakes Corner. And I'm not a sports fan. Melissa really makes the game come alive and reminds us that even in our always-connected, multi-media, anything anywhere age there's still nothing like great sports writing!

Santa Clara Stadium Closer to the Goal Line

Santa Clara County Superior Court rules that stadium financing resolutions are administrative. As "implementations" of Measure J they are not referend-able.

Conspiracy Con 2011: In Xanadu Did Kubla Khan/Satanic Mass Decree…

Douglas D. Dietrich is a striking presence. Part Chinese and Japanese, his face is one that you don't forget. If you sent to central casting for an oriental despot, or a James Bond villain, they'd send in Douglas Dietrich.

When you talk with him privately, Dietrich seems a gentle soul, with the antique gallantry of a bygone age. He's a veteran of Desert Storm and Desert Shield, born in Formosa to a Navy family.

I pick up a sense of betrayal behind his history and I ask about it. He feels his father was mistreated by the VA medical system and that the VA denied medical problems Dietrich suffered from his tours of duty in Iraq. This is hardly improbable.

Dietrich is also a compelling story-teller, and his rococo tales of diabolical practices at the highest levels of military power would stand to make him quite successful as a sci-fi novelist, scriptwriter, or graphic novelist. Except Deitrich doesn't present his dark stories as fiction.

Dietrich covers a lot of ground in his rapid-fire presentation. One minute we're in 12^th century Japan, the next in 1945 Okinawa.

"In 1281 Kubla Khan invaded Japan [with]…over 70,000 Mongol marines armed with the Turkish composite crossbow…There was nothing the emperor could do but get down on his knees and pray to the ancestors. and they… answered. " Dun-de-dun-dun. "That was the kamikaze. The winds on that day were 150 mph and every single man on that fleet died. The Japanese told the Americans 'we can do that again.'"

This is a promising start for an Indiana Jones movie. But, instead of Hollywood-brand escapism, the next hour and a half is a whirlwind roundup of – I'm putting this as plainly as possible – satanic occult practices at the San Francisco Presidio army base, with tangential forays into Roswell and Nazi Germany. Before we're done, we'll make pit stops at the Dresden firebombing, the Holocaust, L.Ron Hubbard, and that noted Satanist Sammy Davis Junior.

Dietrich's central focus is Lt. Col. Michael Aquino, who, he says "served most of his time in Vietnam in his satanic chaplaincy…[and]wrote the diabolicon, a series of quatrains that were channeled through Lt. Col Aquino [via] seven demonic spirits."

I wonder what you call it when storytellers fail to distinguish between themselves and their stories. I don't mean to be flippant.

There's a pattern here that suggests something neurological. Conspiracy Con presentations share two characteristics: First, they're vast, unorganized data dumps. Second, individual sentences (the datum) have the outward characteristics of being statements that communicate information, but on examination are empty of content.

For example here's once-and-future-dentist Lennie Horowitz:

"It is the amount of disinformation and fear that undermines our ability to act …I know for sure that on the spiritual plane they're regulating the church of Satan through the Rothschilds. They're acting through infiltrators. And these infiltrators may not even know themselves that they are acting through MKULTRA. That's the only way I may be able to know that you are mind-controlled."

Or this from galactic historian and UFO abductee Stewart Swerdlow:

"The Illuminati are at the top of their food chain. It doesn't really matter who's in control…It's who allows them to be in control. If everybody takes responsibility for themselves and eliminates the piece of what they're projecting, the illuminati will have no power over you and will disappear from the face of the earth forever."

Or try this from chemtrail theorist Sofia Smallstorm:

When we look at an organization called MITRE, .you go to their website, and their mission is to set the goals and the template for the…IRS….and they contract with operation cloverleaf… and if you google USA today for  May 12…the reporters talk about a thousand particles on the head of a pin….Get those letters and know those individuals. Those are the cross directors of the enemy we have to deal with today."

Or this from self-described former Illuminati witch Doc Marquis (who suffers from the misfortune of an Elmer Fudd-like lisp): 

"Plans are in the making between 2013 and 2018….2012 is the smokescreen [he says "smokescween"]. I have fought over releasing this piece of information. What if on or about December 21^st 2012 the usurper in the White House, who is a Muslim, is assassinated by a Jew…Everyone in the world would literally get involved. This is part of what may or may not happen."

Granted, I can't write fast enough to catch all the words, but, if anything, my redacted versions are more comprehensible than the originals.

But while I'm trying to capture this dizzying spectacle of flying information shrapnel, a war is brewing behind the scenes between conspiracist icons anti-vaccine crusader and former dentist Lennie Horowitz and shock-u-mentary maker and catastrophist Anthony Hilder.

Conspiracy Con 2011 - The Live Blog - True Otts and Conspiracy Gaming

My first stop is to catch the tail end of Len Horowitz and Sherri Kane who are ranting about…well, I'm not sure what. Something about "True Ott" and the Gabrielle Giffords shooting. "Now that we know that truth about this…we had to ask Brian Hall for extra security. We're not going to stay around for obvious reasons."

Horowitz is a dentist who found he could make a lot more money selling new age cures to the gullible than doing root canals. Unlike most of the people here, he's tan and fit and looks more likely to be shilling for Thigh Master than Rebirthing Ourselves in the Creator's Image.

I'm not even going to try to understand what's going on. So I duck out and stop by Steve Jackson Games where, in my now-softened frame of mind, I part with 40 devalued fiat federal reserve "dollars" for "Illuminati: The Game of Conspiracy."

The card deck features eight illuminati cards – The Bavarian Illuminati, The Gnomes of Zurich, etc. – 83 "group" cards – fast food chains, the FBI, etc. – 15 "special" cards – market manipulation, murphy's law – two black dice (with white dots), and a 16-page instruction book. The object of the game is to control the world. That's about as far as I get.

The more interesting part of the conversation is with a young man named Christopher Gordon, who looks like the host of an MTV music video countdown but who is in real life a mortician. His take on his profession is anything but grim.

Indeed, we're all going to die and Gordon sees his role as supplying a more natural and affordable way to go than the American Way of Death. Before I leave he presses a handful of DVDs on me in hopes that he can persuade me to see the light. One is titled "Henrick Palmgren interviews Michael Tsarion, David Icke PLUS 67 OTHER INTERVIEWS IN 8 DAYS OF AUDIO ON MP3'S."

If nothing else, this cabal promotes a degree of multi-partisanship unseen anywhere else in the political spectrum. I ask: Where else can you find Phyllis Schlafley's Eagle Forum cheek-by-jowl with Democrats Against UN Agenda 21, the MUFON Symposium, and the Green Party?

The next stop is Douglas Dietrich, where I take 2,000 words of notes and wonder about the origins of psychosis. 

Conspiracy Con 2011 - The Live Blog

Dateline: Conspiracy Con, Santa Clara, CA

June 4, 2011 

Ominously, it's raining today. Really raining. Now, heavy rain is an extremely low probability event in Santa Clara in June. And you might be tempted to point to it as evidence of (take your pick):

1.           Global warming
2.          The global chemtrail conspiracy
3.          Project HAARP global weather manipulation conspiracy

Which makes it a perfect note on which to begin live-blogging from Conspiracy Con. That's because it illustrates the predominant fallacies that will be on display for the next 48 hours:

o   Sweeping generalization: It's June and it's raining in Santa Clara. Rain is unusual in June in Santa Clara. Therefore, something unusual is going on.

o   Straw man: Weather manipulation would cause unusual storms. We are having an unusual storm. Therefore the weather is being manipulated.

o   Causal oversimplification: Global warming is the cause of unseasonable weather, rather than a cause.

o   False cause: It's raining. Conspiracy Con is this weekend. Therefore Conspiracy Con caused the rain. 

Actually, the 2010-2011 rainfall year has been – get ready for this – exactly average. And while heavy rain in June is a low-probability event, it's not a zero probability event. In fact, while May 2011 temperatures averaged 7 degrees below normal, so did May 2010 temperatures. And, rainfall for the year at the end of May was slightly below normal.

In other words, today's weather proves exactly…nothing.

So with that note of skepticism, it's time to take a deeper dive into the murky pool that is Conspiracy Con.  

Shell Game or Prudent Planning? The latest Santa Clara RDA money shuffle

Despite the ostensible urgency that demanded an emergency meeting of the Santa Clara RDA/Stadium Authority Monday to transfer $4.5 million to a SF 49ers business entity called Stadco, no one seems to know who called the emergency. 


"[I] Can't pinpoint exactly who was the driving force," is how one member of the City staff -- who have been working on the details of the resolution round-the-clock since Thursday -- answered a direct question from Jamie McLeod. Details of the 26-page proposal -- plus about 50, mostly critical, emails -- were not made public until 5:10 p.m. Monday afternoon. 

Despite the fact that no one is quite clear whose idea it was, the City Council was crystal clear in approving it; with Council Members Lisa Gillmor, Pat Kolstad, Pat Mahan, Jamie Matthews, and Kevin Moore voting in favor, and Will Kennedy and Jamie McLeod opposing. "This is an excellent document," said Council Member Kolstad in his ringing endorsement of the proposal.



Predevelopment Agreement for Stadium Site Infrastructure

The move is the latest in a series of efforts to shield money that the City has allocated to redevelopment agency (RDA) projects. Like many other RDAs, Santa Clara is attempting to protect control over RDA assets by transferring them to city government. However, as the legislation continues to evolve, some fear that transfers between municipal agencies may not secure the assets. Their logic is that the only way to protect RDA money may be to put it in private -- not public -- hands. 

The proposal currently on the table in Sacramento moves control of redevelopment assets to currently unspecified local "successor agencies." And those successor agencies are not necessarily city governments. This raises the specter of successor agencies selling parks, libraries and fire stations to private owners.

Further, it's difficult to pinpoint just how the tax increment pie will be sliced, should the RDAs shut down. (Tax increments are the central funding mechanism for redevelopment, and divert the increase in tax revenues resulting from redevelopment back to the RDA). Presumably, after the first year -- where money will flow back to the state to close the budget deficit -- any revenue above what's needed to pay off debt will be divided by the same formula that is used for distributing other tax revenue. 

What won't happen is that all the RDA assets will flow into municipal coffers, although school districts will see more revenue. Combined with California's zany school district boundaries, this fans the fires of  a zero-sum competition between school districts and municipal governments as each vies for a bigger slice of a diminishing pie. 

For example, if the San Jose RDA is abolished, Santa Clara Unified School District will receive its proportional share of north San Jose property taxes. Currently, those property taxes are diverted by the San Jose RDA, leaving SCUSD to deal with a potential doubling of its student population with no additional revenue. Either SCUSD loses or San Jose 

Santa Clara voters approved a ballot measure last June to go forward with a 49ers stadium project. However, the Stadium Authority and Stadco are still negotiating the project's terms and conditions and  the complex financing plan for construction has yet to be completed or approved. Should the project fall through, "the advanced funds that are spent for makeready work will not be recoverable," explains City staff analysis of the measure.

The "predevelopment funding" aims "to ensure that the $4 million previously earmarked for this project, as well as the project tax increment are protected and are used for the purposes which the Council has identified and the voters have confirmed," said Deputy City Manager Carol McCarthy, in presenting the proposed resolution.

The $4.5 million that the Santa Clara Stadium Authority (SA) will advance to Stadco will pay for "make ready" infrastructure such as demolition, clearing and grading, design, relocating high voltage transmission lines, and regulatory compliance on city-owned land. This infrastructure would be needed for any development on the city-owned land, according to McCarthy. The site is currently leased by Great America for overflow parking.

"It is expected that the City, as owner of the Stadium site, will benefit from the work installed on and adjacent to the site," continues the analysis, "however it is possible that the work may not have value for future development, depending upon the nature of future development on the site."

All of this presents unacceptable risk for Santa Clara say opponents of the measure."The 49ers LLC is an entertainment business operating in our city," Santa Clara resident Clysta McLemore told the City Council. "It is not a bank. Our property tax dollars belong in a public agency to be used for the public good. Tonight's proposal opens the city to absorbing more front-end risk while our city services are being cut, city employees are being furloughed, and school budgets are being decimated," adding that "Measure J didn't discuss predevelopment costs."

"What it looks like from the outside … [is that] you are acting in parochial interests to sequester funds that are ours, not the team's," City resident William Ray warned the Council. "And in doing so you are acting against the interests of the people of California, of which we are members. The idea of racing the clock ahead of the governor and legislature is unconscionable," adding that in his previous home of Palm Beach County, FL, three recent county commissioners -- Tony Masilotti, Mary McCarty, and Warren Newell – are currently serving federal prison sentences for corruption and bribery.

Summary of pre-development funds transfer:

Stadco Predevelopment Costs

• Stadco has incurred a lot of predevelopment costs to date
• Stadco will advance the sa the $40 million for the benefits of SA
• Predevelopment costs includes SA operating costs

Payment of Initial Make-Ready Funds:

• SA advances $4 million to Stadco upon execution of agreement
• Kept in separate account along with any interest earned
• May be used only for make-ready work and SA operating costs in accordance with appropriated budget
• SA will hold RDA potion of development fees in separate account
• Funds returned/retained by SA if stadium is not built

Does the Monday's Emergency RDA Meeting Violate the Brown Act?

One question that is begged by Monday's short-notice RDA meeting is whether the meeting violates the California's 1953 Brown Act, mandating that public agencies conduct their business in a way that is open to public scrutiny. 

The Brown act requires agencies to post meeting agendas at least 72 hours in advance, in a "freely accessible" location, and to describe each item of business – including items discussed in closed sessions – with "enough information to enable members of the general public to determine the general nature of subject matter." Further, public agencies and boards may not discuss, nor take action on, items that aren't on the agenda.

The law allows three exceptions to the agenda requirements: emergencies, a situation requiring immediate action, and items posted on previous agendas. Closed sessions are permitted to discuss personnel matters, pending litigation, real estate negotiation, and labor negotiations. Minutes from closed sessions are exempt from public disclosure rules.

Technically, the meeting and a one-page agenda were posted on the City website Friday, just within the 72 hour limit. But Friday March 18, 2011 was a furlough day -- City offices were closed. However, according to the City attorney, the one page agenda that was posted on Friday does comply with state law. 

"The people, in delegating authority," says the introduction to the Brown Act, "do not give their public servants the right to decide what is good for the people to know and what is not good for them to know." 
The administrative panic about the threat of RDA shutdown might lead some to think that Santa Clara's City Council doesn't agree.